A QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER
BROUGHT TO YOU BY REDSTONE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Court Ruling Could Lead to Higher Taxes,
Unsafe Roads Here and Elsewhere
Residents urged to get involved in
fight for increased transportation fundingAre you already fed up with the spike in gas
prices? Well, take heed. A recent ruling by the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court has the potential to
lighten your wallet even more and may jeopardize
the safety of the roads your family travels
every day.
The decision in
Youngwood v. PennsylvaniaPrevailing Wage Appeals Board
means that yourtownship must now pay contracted workers higher
wages — commonly referred to as “prevailing
wages” — for routine road maintenance projects,
a mandate that could add up to 30 percent to their
wage costs and fuel local property tax increases
statewide.
This decision is just one more blow for the
commonwealth’s municipalities, which maintain
more miles of roads than the state Department
of Transportation; however, lawmakers continue
to ignore their growing need for increased transportation
funding.
Who’s the real loser?
In early 2007, for instance, Gov. Ed Rendell
began pushing the General Assembly to scrape
together the money to improve the state’s aging
roads and bridges and prop up mass transit. As
a result, lawmakers passed Act 44 last summer,
which would turn Interstate 80 into a toll roadand generate about $900 million a year in new
transportation dollars with only a small percentage
earmarked for municipalities.
Controversial from the start, Act 44 faces an
uncertain future.
Now, Rendell is touting the benefits of leasing
the Pennsylvania Turnpike, a move he claims
will raise an estimated $1 billion a year for roads,
bridges, and mass transit. At the same time, Senate
Majority Leader Joe Scarnati has introduced
legislation to repeal Act 44 and divert $510 million
a year from the state’s Motor License Fund to pay
for transportation projects.
But there’s a troubling side to these proposals
that you, as a township resident, must understand:
These transportation initiatives would funnel very
little money — and in some cases,
no money atall
— to your township, which is responsible formaintaining many of the roads and bridges that you
use to get to work and your children take to school.
Instead, millions of dollars of vital funding
would go to PennDOT, the Southeastern Pennsylvania
Transportation Authority in Philadelphia,
the Port Authority of Allegheny County in Pittsburgh,
and other public transportation providers.
“The state is looking out for the state and mass
transit,” says Ken Grimes, president of the Pennsylvania
State Association of Townships Supervisors,
which represents 1,465 townships of the
second class, “but what lawmakers are forgetting
is that township roads connect Pennsylvanians to
state highways and bridges.
“If those local roads deteriorate to the point where
they can’t handle the traffic or they pose safety risks
to travelers, then what have we really accomplished
— other than wasting precious tax dollars?”
And the sad truth is, this lack of support from
the state, coupled with the court’s prevailing
wage mandate and escalating gasoline, diesel,
and asphalt costs, is backing many township offi
cials into a corner.
Some, unfortunately, may be forced to raise
property taxes or cut services to cover the gaps
in their transportation budgets. Others may
simply have to put much-needed road repairs on
the back burner, a situation that could turn good
roads to bad very quickly.
Either way, there’s one real loser in this equation:
you.
The voice of voters is critical
That’s why it’s imperative that you get involved
in the grassroots fight to change Pennsylvania’s
Prevailing Wage Act and secure new state funding
to improve your township’s roads and bridges.
The voice of voters is critical, especially on
the prevailing wage front, says Rep. Ronald
Marsico
(R-Dauphin), who has been pushingto amend the law for 20 years, with little luck.
In fact, in recent months, he and other lawmakers
have proposed numerous amendments that
would bring financial relief to townships, but all
have remained buried in committee.
Marsico isn’t surprised. “We have a labor
union-dominated legislature,” he says. “Many of
us have been fighting for a repeal or a local option,
and we just don’t have enough votes.”
That would change, Marsico believes, if
Pennsylvanians, like you, knew the price they
are paying to support prevailing wages.
“This is costing the commonwealth hundreds
of millions of tax dollars a year that could be saved
by repealing the prevailing wage and making it
the market wage,” he says. “I think it’s about time
the taxpayers realize the prevailing wage rates are
costing them higher taxes across the board.
“You have to change the legislators’ minds,”
Marsico adds, “and what it takes to do that is the
citizens getting more vocal and getting active.”
Support your township
So what can you do?
First, call the township office or attend one
of the supervisors’ monthly meetings. Ask them
about the Supreme Court’s
Youngwood decisionand its impact on your community. Very likely,
you will hear that local officials have had to
make some tough choices.
Document their stories, tell your neighbors,
and encourage them to become advocates for
your township. This includes calling the state
senators and representatives who serve your
district and demanding they first address the
prevailing wage mandate and then provide additional
funding for local roads.
(You can getlawmakers’ names and phone numbers from
your township.)
The bottom line is that townships statewide
are facing a lot of rising costs, from fuel to steel
and concrete, PSATS President Ken Grimes
says. “There’s nothing the state can do about
those,” he says, “but it can do something about
the prevailing wage law.”
That won’t happen, he adds, unless municipalities,
residents, and other groups form a united
front. “If we do nothing, we’ll get nothing,”
Grimes says. “We all have to heed a call to action.”
“What lawmakers are forgetting is that township roads connect Pennsylvanians to state highways and bridges. If those local roads deteriorate to the point where they can’t handle the traf
fic or they pose safety risks to travelers, then what have we really accomplished — other than wasting precious tax dollars?”